Goodman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 17-275V
    Filed: January 17, 2018
    UNPUBLISHED
    PAUL GOODMAN,
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Petitioner,                          Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    v.                                                       Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine;
    Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Injury Related to Vaccine
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                          Administration (SIRVA)
    Respondent.
    Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.
    Debra A. Filteau Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On February 27, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of influenza (“flu”) and pneumococcal
    conjugate vaccines on March 21, 2016.. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the
    Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On November 14, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On January 16, 2018, respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $80,000.00.
    Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner
    is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
    petitioner a lump sum payment of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner, Paul Goodman. This amount represents compensation for all damages
    that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    *************************************
    PAUL GOODMAN,                       *
    *
    Petitioner,       *                        No. 17-275V
    *                        CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER
    v.                                  *                        NORA BETH DORSEY
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND             *
    HUMAN SERVICES,                     *
    *
    Respondent.       *
    *************************************
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.     Items of Compensation
    The Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement on November 14, 2017. Based upon the
    evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $80,000.00, which
    represents compensation for past and future pain and suffering. This amount represents all
    elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1
    Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that petitioner be awarded a lump sum payment of $80,000.00 in the
    form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.
    Respectfully submitted,
    CHAD A. READLER
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move
    the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future
    medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY
    DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Phone: (202) 616-4181
    Dated: January 16, 2018
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-275

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 4/11/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021