Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •            In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 15-049V
    Filed: May 7, 2015
    ****************************
    VIOLET WILSON,             *
    *
    *
    Petitioner, *                               Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    *                               Tetanus, Diphtheria, acellular Pertussis
    v.                         *                               (“Tdap”); Shoulder Injury Related to
    *                               Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”);
    *                               Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH        *
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,        *
    *
    Respondent. *
    ****************************
    Andrew Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for petitioner.
    Justine Walters, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    Vowell, Chief Special Master:
    On January 20, 2015, Violet Wilson filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq, 2 [the
    “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleges that as a result of a Tetanus,
    Diphtheria, acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on July 1, 2014, petitioner suffered a
    “shoulder injury related to vaccine administration.” Petition at ¶10. The case was
    assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.
    On April 8, 2015, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to
    compensation. On May 7, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation
    (“Proffer”) detailing compensation for all elements of compensation to which petitioner
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend
    to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). In accordance with
    Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information,
    the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
    the identified material fits within this definition, I will delete such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2006).
    would be entitled under §15(a). According to respondent’s Proffer, petitioner agrees to
    the proposed award of compensation.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
    This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available
    under §15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Denise K. Vowell
    Denise K. Vowell
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    )
    VIOLET WILSON,                                )
    )
    Petitioner,                            )
    )       No. 15-49V
    v.                                     )       Chief Special Master Vowell
    )       ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                       )       SPU
    HUMAN SERVICES,                               )
    )
    Respondent.                            )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.     Items of Compensation
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    $80,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
    Petitioner agrees.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BENJAMIN C. MIZER
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
    Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
    expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
    VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    GLENN A. MACLEOD
    Senior Trial Counsel
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/ Justine Walters
    JUSTINE WALTERS
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 307-6393
    DATE: May 7, 2015
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-49

Judges: Denise Kathryn Vowell

Filed Date: 5/28/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021