Graham v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 16-1583V
    Filed: June 21, 2017
    UNPUBLISHED
    ****************************
    BETSY GRAHAM,                             *
    *
    Petitioner,          *     Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    v.                                        *     Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination;
    *     Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                       *     Administration (“SIRVA”);
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                       *     Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
    *
    Respondent.          *
    *
    ****************************
    Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.
    Kathryn Robinette, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On November 29, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) that was “caused in fact” by an influenza (“flu”) vaccination.
    Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of
    Special Masters.
    On June 20, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
    that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report
    at 1. Specifically, respondent believes petitioner has satisfied her burden in showing
    that her flu vaccination was the cause-in-fact of her SIRVA. Id. at 7. Respondent
    further agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under
    the Vaccine Act. Id.
    1
    Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the
    undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1583

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 4/24/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/25/2018