Hallead v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •            Case 1:16-vv-00979-UNJ Document 25 Filed 04/10/17 Page 1 of 2
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 16-979V
    Filed: April 10, 2017
    UNPUBLISHED
    ****************************
    JACKLYN HALLEAD,                        *
    *
    Petitioner,          *     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    v.                                      *     Influenza (“Flu”); Shoulder Injury
    *     Related to Vaccine Administration
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                     *     (“SIRVA”);
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                     *     Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
    *
    Respondent.          *
    *
    ****************************
    Leah Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
    Ann Martin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On August 10, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) related to an influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on
    September 29, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
    Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On February 2, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner
    entitled to compensation for a SIRVA. On April 7, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $140,305.01.
    Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    Case 1:16-vv-00979-UNJ Document 25 Filed 04/10/17 Page 2 of 2
    proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner
    is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
    petitioner a lump sum payment of $140.305.01 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner, Jacklyn Hallead. This amount represents compensation for all damages
    that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    Case 1:16-vv-00979-UNJ Document 25-1 Filed 04/10/17 Page 1 of 2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ____________________________________
    )
    JACKLYN HALLEAD,                     )
    )
    Petitioner,              )
    )   No. 16-979V
    v.                            )   Chief Special Master Dorsey
    )   ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND             )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                     )
    )
    Respondent.             )
    ____________________________________)
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.     Items of Compensation
    For purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine-related” is as described in Respondent’s
    Rule 4(c) Report, filed on February 2, 2017, conceding entitlement in this case. Based upon the
    evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $140,305.01, which
    represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C.
    § 300aa-15(a) for her vaccine-related injury. 1 Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $140,305.01 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
    Petitioner agrees.
    Respectfully submitted,
    CHAD A. READLER
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
    expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
    Case 1:16-vv-00979-UNJ Document 25-1 Filed 04/10/17 Page 2 of 2
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    LINDA S. RENZI
    Senior Trial Counsel
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/ Ann D. Martin
    ANN D. MARTIN
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 307-1815
    DATED: April 7, 2017
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-979

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 12/6/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021