Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 16-1231V
    Filed: May 9, 2017
    UNPUBLISHED
    ****************************
    KELLY WILLIAMS,                       *
    *
    Petitioner,       *       Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    v.                                    *       Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder
    *       Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                   *       (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                   *       (“SPU”)
    *
    Respondent.       *
    *
    ****************************
    Jonathan C. Pleban, Pleban & Petruska Law, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for petitioner.
    Michael Patrick Milmoe, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On September 30, 2016, Kelly Williams (“petitioner”) filed a petition for
    compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
    §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder
    injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of receiving a seasonal
    influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 8, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to
    the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On May 9, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
    petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
    Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner’s injury is consistent with a shoulder
    injury related to vaccine administration” and petitioner’s injury is not due to factors
    unrelated to her October 8, 2014 flu vaccination. 
    Id. at 3.
    Respondent further agrees
    1
    Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    that petitioner met the statutory requirements by suffering the condition for more than
    six months. 
    Id. In view
    of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the
    undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1231

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 12/12/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/13/2017