Trigueros v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    *********************
    LUIS TRIGUEROS,          *
    *                          No. 16-1058V
    Petitioner, *                          Special Master Christian J. Moran
    *
    v.                       *
    *                          Filed: October 17, 2017
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH      *
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,      *                          Ruling on entitlement;
    *                          Influenza vaccine;
    Respondent. *                          Guillain-Barre syndrome.
    *********************
    Ronald C. Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for
    Petitioner;
    Camille M. Collett, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
    Respondent.
    UNPUBLISHED RULING FINDING ENTITLEMENT1
    On August 25, 2016, Luis Trigueros filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq.
    (2006). Mr. Trigueros alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre syndrome (“GBS”)
    as a result of a flu vaccine administered on October 2, 2013.
    In the Rule 4(c) report, respondent stated that the Division of Vaccine Injury
    Compensation, Department of Health and Human Services, has reviewed the facts
    of this case and have concluded that “the evidence shows that petitioner suffered
    GBS following the administration of a seasonal flu vaccine, and that the onset
    occurred within the time period specified in the [newly revised Vaccine Injury]
    1
    The E-Government Act, 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this ruling on its website.
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of
    medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any
    redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
    Table.” Resp’t’s Rep. at 7-8. As a result, “respondent will not contest entitlement
    to compensation in this case.” Id. at 8.
    Special masters may determine whether a petitioner is entitled to
    compensation based upon the record. A hearing is not required. 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa-13; Vaccine Rule 8(d). Based upon a review of the record as a whole, the
    undersigned finds that petitioner has established that he is entitled to
    compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    S/ Christian J. Moran
    _______________________________
    Christian J. Moran
    Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1058

Judges: Christian J. Moran

Filed Date: 12/21/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2017