Keller v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 16-188V
    Filed: June 20, 2016
    Unpublished
    ****************************
    SUSAN KELLER,                           *
    *
    Petitioner,         *      Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    v.                                      *      Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder
    *      Injury Related to Vaccine
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                     *      Administration (“SIRVA”); Special
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                     *      Processing Unit (“SPU”)
    *
    Respondent.         *
    *
    ****************************
    Ronald C. Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.
    Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On February 8, 2016, Susan Keller (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et
    seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving an influenza
    (“flu”) vaccine on November 17, 2014, she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”). The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit
    (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.
    On May 20, 2016, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement, finding
    petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On June 17, 2016, respondent filed a
    proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded
    $125,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that
    petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
    petitioner a lump sum payment of $125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner, Susan Keller. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
    would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    SUSAN KELLER,                 )
    )
    Petitioner,         )
    v.                            )                     No. 16-188V
    )                     Chief Special Master Dorsey
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )                     ECF
    SERVICES,                     )
    )
    Respondent.         )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.     Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items
    Respondent proffers that, based on the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded
    $125,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be
    entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1); 15(a)(3)(A); and 15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment as described below, and request that the special master’s decision
    and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1
    A lump sum payment of $125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner,
    Susan Keller. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42
    U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
    expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BENJAMIN C. MIZER
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
    Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Acting Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/Traci R. Patton
    TRACI R. PATTON
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 146
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 353-1589
    DATE: June 17, 2016
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-188

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 8/4/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2016