Sean Vanyo and Kelly Vanyo, Parents and Natural Guardians of C v. a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •       In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 13-422V
    December 16, 2013
    Not for Publication
    ***************************************
    SEAN VANYO and KELLY VANYO,                      *
    Parents and Natural Guardians of C.V.,           *
    a Minor,                                         *
    *
    Petitioners,                             *
    *
    v.                                           * RotaTeq vaccine; intussusception;
    * respondent concedes entitlement
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                              *
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                              *
    *
    Respondent.                               *
    ***************************************
    Jeffrey A. Golvash, Pittsburgh, PA, for petitioners.
    Darryl R. Wishard, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    MILLMAN, Special Master
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    On June 26, 2013, petitioners filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine
    Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10–34 (2012), alleging that RotaTeq vaccine administered to their
    son C.V.2 on June 30, 2010, caused C.V.’s intussusception, which required surgical intervention.
    1
    Because this unpublished ruling on entitlement contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s
    action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished ruling on entitlement on the United
    States Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No.
    107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special
    masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial
    information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would
    constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days
    to identify and move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master,
    upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special
    master shall delete such material from public access.
    On November 19, 2013, petitioners sent a demand for settlement to respondent.
    On December 13, 2013, respondent filed Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report, stating that the
    case is appropriate for compensation under the Vaccine Act. See Respondent’s Report, Dec. 13,
    2013, ECF No. 15. Respondent requested cancellation of the next scheduled telephonic status
    conference on Monday, January 6, 2014, at 12:00 p.m. (EST). Respondent’s request is
    GRANTED. This case is now in damages.
    FACTS
    C.V. was born on February 22, 2010.
    On June 30, 2010, he received RotaTeq, DTaP, IPV, hepatitis B, HIB, and Prevnar
    vaccinations. Med. recs. Ex. 4, at 1.
    On July 6, 2010, at 4:09 p.m., C.V. was taken to Westmoreland Hospital Emergency
    Department. Med. recs. Ex. 6, at 4. He had been vomiting since 1:00 a.m., was in pain, and was
    not eating. 
    Id. He did
    not have fever. 
    Id. C.V. was
    transferred to Children’s Hospital in
    Pittsburgh where he underwent laparoscopic surgery to resolve his intussusception. 
    Id. at 8;
    Med. recs. Ex. 7, at 94.
    DISCUSSION
    Petitioners had the burden of proving that RotaTeq vaccine caused in fact C.V. to have
    intussusception. With respondent’s concession of liability, petitioners have satisfied their burden
    of proof. The undersigned ORDERS the parties to file a joint status report on their progress in
    settling this case by January 31, 2014.
    CONCLUSION
    With respondent’s concession, this case is now in damages.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    December 16, 2013                                                         s/Laura D. Millman
    DATE                                                                       Laura D. Millman
    Special Master
    2
    Vaccine Rule 16(b) states that “if the petition is filed on behalf of a minor, the caption may include only
    the minor’s initials. To avoid the need for a redaction request and accidental disclosure of the minor
    child’s name in later proceedings in this case, the undersigned instructs the Clerk of Court to modify the
    case caption to the minor’s initials C.V.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-422V

Judges: Special Master Millman

Filed Date: 12/16/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021