Maria Theresa Gawaran v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •        In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 13-151V
    Filed: December 16, 2013
    ***********************************
    MARIA THERESA GAWARAN,                    *           UNPUBLISHED
    *
    *           Special Master Dorsey
    Petitioner,          *
    *           Joint Stipulation on Damages;
    v.                                        *           Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR)
    *           vaccine; skin disorders; scarring;
    *           pain; Attorney’s Fees and Costs;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                       *           Reasonable Amount Requested to
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                       *           which Respondent Does not
    *           Object.
    Respondent.          *
    ***********************************
    Craig S. Walkon, Law Offices of Craig S. Walkon, San Juan Capistrano, CA, for
    petitioner.
    Tara J. Kilfoyle, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
    DECISION1
    On February 28, 2013, Maria Theresa Gawaran (petitioner) filed a petition
    pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1
    1
    Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in
    this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal
    Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-
    347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)).
    As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request
    redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or
    commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes
    medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
    unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).
    2
    The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755,
    codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All
    citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. §
    300aa.
    1
    to -34 (2006). Petitioner seeks compensation for the skin disorders, scarring, and pain
    that she alleges she sustained as a result of her receipt of a Measles-Mumps-Rubella
    (“MMR”) vaccine on January 3, 2012. Petitioner alleges that she experienced the
    residual effects of this injury for more than six months.
    On December 13, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation, stating that a decision
    should be entered awarding compensation and for attorneys’ fees and costs.
    Respondent denies that the MMR immunization or any other immunization is the
    cause of petitioner’s alleged skin disorders, scarring, and pain, and/or any other injury.
    Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A.
    The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court
    in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
    The parties stipulate to the following payments:
    a. A lump sum of $30,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This
    amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under
    42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a); and
    b. A lump sum of $7,136.25, in the form of a check payable to petitioner and
    petitioner’s attorney, Craig S. Walkon, for attorneys’ fees and costs available
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e), and in compliance with General Order #9, no
    out-of-pocket expenses were incurred by petitioners in proceeding on the
    petition.
    Stipulation ¶ 8.
    The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation
    and for attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with
    the stipulation.
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the
    clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the
    parties’ stipulation.3
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint
    filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/ Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Special Master
    3
    Case 1:13-vv-00151-UNJ Document 66 Filed 12/13/13 Page 1 of 5
    Case 1:13-vv-00151-UNJ Document 66 Filed 12/13/13 Page 2 of 5
    Case 1:13-vv-00151-UNJ Document 66 Filed 12/13/13 Page 3 of 5
    Case 1:13-vv-00151-UNJ Document 66 Filed 12/13/13 Page 4 of 5
    Case 1:13-vv-00151-UNJ Document 66 Filed 12/13/13 Page 5 of 5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-151V

Judges: Special Master Dorsey

Filed Date: 12/16/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021