Ann McClenaghan, Administrator of the Estate of Madeline MacKay v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •            In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    (E-Filed: December 19, 2013)
    * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    ANN MCCLENAGHAN,                 *                   No. 12-757V
    Administrator of the Estate of   *
    MADELINE MACKAY, Deceased,       *
    *
    Petitioner, *                   Special Master
    *                   Hamilton-Fieldman
    v.                               *
    *                   Stipulated Decision; Influenza
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH              *                   Vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,              *
    *
    Respondent. *
    * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    Ronald C. Homer, Boston, MA, for Petitioner.
    Tara J. Kilfoyle, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1
    On November 5, 2012, Ann McClenaghan (“Petitioner”), as administrator of the estate
    of Madeline MacKay, deceased, filed a petition seeking compensation under the National
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (the “Program”). 2
    1
    Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s
    action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of
    Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-
    347, § 205, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    , 2913 (codified as amended at 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2006)). As
    provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of
    any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
    substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
    disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
    18(b). Otherwise, “the entire” decision will be available to the public. 
    Id.
    2
    The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    , codified
    as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this
    decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
    1
    Petitioner alleges that as a result of a trivalent influenza vaccination Ms. MacKay
    received on October 21, 2010, Ms. Mackay developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome. Petitioner
    further alleges that Ms. Mackay’s death on November 11, 2010 was the sequela of her alleged
    vaccine-related injury.
    Respondent denies that the flu vaccination caused Ms. MacKay’s Guillain-Barre
    Syndrome, and/or any other injury. Respondent further denies that Ms. MacKay experienced
    the residual effects of her alleged vaccine-related injury for more than six months, and denies
    that Ms. MacKay’s death was vaccine related.
    On December 2, 2013, counsel for both parties filed a stipulation, stating that a decision
    should be entered awarding compensation. The parties stipulated that Petitioner shall receive
    the following compensation:
    A lump sum of $ 302,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner as legal
    representative of the estate of Madeline MacKay. This amount represents compensation
    for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a) . . . .
    Stipulation ¶ 8.
    The parties further stipulated that they will submit to further proceedings to award
    reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition. Stipulation ¶9.
    Pursuant to the attached Stipulation (Appendix A), the undersigned approves as
    reasonable the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award
    should be made in the form of a check payable to Petitioner in the amount of $302,500.00.
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
    court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
    Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
    Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’
    joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-757V

Judges: Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman

Filed Date: 12/19/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021