Knapp v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1003V
    Filed: October 29, 2019
    UNPUBLISHED
    ERNEST KNAPP,
    Special Master Horner
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                       Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    Tdap, Brachial Neuritis
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Bridget McCullough, Esq., Miller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA for petitioner.
    Voris Johnson, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    On July 12, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine
    Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from brachial neuritis. Petition at 1. The case
    was assigned to Special Master Christian Moran. On April 29, 2019, a ruling on
    entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for his brachial
    neuritis. On August 27, 2019, this case was assigned to me.
    On October 29, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation
    (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $60,000, plus satisfaction of a
    Medicaid lien in the amount of $2,302.91. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent
    represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. 
    Id. Based on
    the record as
    a whole, I find that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    1I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the
    decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule
    18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of
    which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified
    material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished
    decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United
    States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. §
    3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner
    $62,302.91 as follows:
    •   A lump sum payment of $60,000 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner; and
    •   A lump sum payment of $2,302.91 in the form of a check payable jointly to
    petitioner and
    Department of Health Care Services
    Recovery Branch – MS 4720
    P.O. Box 997421
    Sacramento, CA 95899-7421
    Re: DHCS Acct. No. C92244986A-VAC03.
    Petitioner agrees to endorse this check over to the Department of Health
    Care Services.
    This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under
    §15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/ Daniel T. Horner
    Daniel T. Horner
    Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    __________________________________________
    )
    ERNEST KNAPP,                              )
    )
    Petitioner,              )
    )  No. 18-1003V (ECF)
    v.                                        )   Special Master Horner
    )
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                       )
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                       )
    )
    Respondent.             )
    __________________________________________)
    RESPONDENT’S AMENDED PROFFER ON AWARD OF DAMAGES
    On April 26, 2019, respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed his
    Rule 4(c) Report conceding entitlement to compensation in this matter on the basis that a
    preponderance of the evidence establishes a Vaccine Table injury of brachial neuritis following a
    Tdap vaccine. On April 29, 2019, the Court entered its Ruling on Entitlement, finding petitioner
    Ernest Knapp entitled to Vaccine Act compensation. Respondent now proffers that petitioner
    receive a compensation award consisting of a lump sum of $60,000.00 in the form of a check
    payable to petitioner, Ernest Knapp, 1 plus satisfaction of a Medicaid lien in the amount of
    $2,302.91, in the form of a check made payable jointly to petitioner 2 and:
    Department of Health Care Services
    Recovery Branch – MS 4720
    P.O. Box 997421
    Sacramento, CA 95899-7421
    Re: DHCS Acct. No. C92244986A-VAC03
    1
    Petitioner is a competent adult. No guardianship is required.
    2
    Petitioner agrees to endorse this check over to the Department of Health Care Services.
    These amounts represent compensation for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa-15(a) to which petitioner is entitled. 3
    Petitioner agrees with the proffered award of $60,000.00, plus satisfaction of the
    Medicaid lien in the amount of $2,302.91. 4
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/Voris E. Johnson, Jr.
    VORIS E. JOHNSON, JR.
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Ben Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Direct dial: (202) 616-4136
    Dated: October 29, 2019
    3
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for
    future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties
    reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief.
    4
    This proffer does not include any award for attorneys’ fees and costs that may be awarded
    pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1003

Judges: Daniel T. Horner

Filed Date: 11/27/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/27/2019