Barr v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 14-977V
    Filed: February 4, 2015
    Unpublished
    ****************************
    JENNIFER PEABODY BARR,                   *
    *
    Petitioner,           *     Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    *     Trivalent Influenza or Flu Vaccine;
    *     Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                      *     Administration; SIRVA; Special
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                      *     Processing Unit
    *
    Respondent.           *
    *
    ****************************
    Sean Lyons, Esq.,Nashville, TN for petitioner.
    Claudia Gangi, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    Vowell, Chief Special Master:
    On October 14, 2014, Jennifer Peabody Barr filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et
    seq,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder
    injury which was caused by the trivalent influenza vaccination she received on
    December 19, 2013. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
    Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On February 4, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she
    concedes “that compensation is appropriate in this case.” Respondent’s Rule 4(c)
    Report at 3. Specifically, respondent believes “that the alleged injury is consistent with
    a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”).” 
    Id. Respondent further
    agrees that petitioner’s injury lasted for more than six months. 
    Id. 1 Because
    this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to
    post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act
    of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501
    note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2006).
    In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that
    petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    s/Denise K. Vowell
    Denise K. Vowell
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-977

Judges: Denise Kathryn Vowell

Filed Date: 2/25/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/25/2015