Engstrom Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 16-1152V
    Filed: October 18, 2018
    Not for Publication
    *************************************
    DEVON ENGSTROM and ERIC                    *
    ENGSTROM, on behalf of C.E., a Minor *
    Child,                                     *
    *                 Damages decision based on
    *                 stipulation; diphtheria-tetanus-
    Petitioners,                  *                 acellular pertussis (“DTaP”),
    *                 inactivated poliovirus (“IPV”),
    v.                                        *                 haemophilus influenza B (“Hib”),
    *                 rotavirus, and pneumococcal
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                        *                 conjugate vaccines; Transverse
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                        *                 myelitis
    *
    Respondent.                   *
    *
    *************************************
    Amber D. Wilson, Washing, DC, for petitioners.
    Camille M. Collett, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    MILLMAN, Special Master
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On October 17, 2018, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle
    this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioners allege, on behalf of their son, that C.E.
    suffered from transverse myelitis as a result of his receipt of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis
    (“DTaP”), inactivated poliovirus (“IPV”), haemophilus influenza B (“Hib”), rotavirus, and
    pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on or about September 28, 2015. They further allege that C.E.
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
    case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
    Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    ,
    2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    Internet. Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the
    public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and
    confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted
    invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete
    such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the
    identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall delete such
    material from public access.
    experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Respondent denies that
    the DTaP, IPV, Hib, rotavirus, and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines caused C.E. to suffer
    transverse myelitis or any other injury. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter
    informally.
    The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby
    adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and
    on the terms set for therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards:
    a. a lump sum of $150,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioners, as
    guardian/conservator of C.E.’s estate;
    b. a lump sum of $1,547.89, in the form of a check payable to petitioners; and
    c. a lump sum of $150.58, representing reimbursement of the State of Pennsylvania
    Medicaid lien for services rendered on behalf of C.E. in the form of a check payable
    jointly to petitioners and
    Pennsylvania Department of Human Services
    Case #280431471
    P.O. Box 8486
    Harrisburg, PA 17105-8486
    These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
    U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
    court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    Dated: October 18, 2018                                           s/ Laura D. Millman
    Laura D. Millman
    Special Master
    2
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
    jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1152

Judges: Laura D. Millman

Filed Date: 11/13/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2018