Cabrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL MASTERS
    Filed: May 28, 2019
    * * * * * * * * * * * *                                *
    ERIC P. CABRERA and CAROL                              *
    CABRERA, natural parents and guardians                 *
    of L.C., a minor,                                      *        UNPUBLISHED
    *
    Petitioners,                                  *        No. 13-598V
    *
    v.                                                     *        Special Master Gowen
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                                    *        Damages; Off-Table Injury;
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                                    *        Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis
    *        (“DTaP”); Juvenile Idiopathic
    Respondent.                                   *        Arthritis (“JIA”).
    *    *   * * * *           *    *   *    *    *   *    *
    Sylvia Chin-Caplan, Law Office of Sylvia Chin-Caplan, Boston, MA, for petitioners.
    Darryl R. Wishard, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION ON DAMAGES1
    On August 21, 2013, Eric and Carol Cabrera (“petitioners”), on behalf of their minor child
    L.C., filed a petition under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Act”
    or the “Program”).2 Petition (ECF No. 1). Petitioners alleged that as a result of receiving a
    diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (“DTaP”) vaccine on August 30, 2010, L.C. developed
    juvenile idiopathic arthritis (“JIA”). 
    Id. at ¶
    3-4. Respondent recommended against awarding
    compensation. Respondent’s Report (ECF No. 27). Each party submitted expert reports. An
    entitlement hearing was held on November 19, 2015. Transcript (ECF No. 73). Following the
    1
    Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a
    reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of
    Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. This means the
    opinion will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the decision is posted on the court’s
    website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party:
    (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that
    includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
    privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the
    opinion. 
    Id. If neither
    party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the
    court’s website without any changes. 
    Id. 2 The
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine
    Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (2012).
    All citations in this opinion are to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa.
    submission of post-hearing briefs, on January 12, 2017, the undersigned issued a ruling that
    petitioners had established entitlement to compensation based on a theory of causation-in-fact.
    Ruling on Entitlement (ECF No. 82).
    On May 21, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on an award of compensation, which
    indicates petitioners’ agreement to compensation on the terms set forth therein. Proffer (ECF
    No. 153). The proffer is attached hereto as Appendix A.
    Consistent with the terms of the proffer, I hereby award the following compensation
    for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):
    1) A lump sum payment of $223,697.00 (representing $175,000.00 for past and
    future pain and suffering and $48,697.00 for projected vaccine-related expenses),
    via a check payable to petitioners as guardian(s)/ conservator(s) of the estate of L.C.,
    for L.C.’s benefit;
    2) A lump sum payment of $1,934.72 (for past unreimbursable expenses), via a check
    payable to petitioners; and
    3) A lump sum payment of $5,289.41 (for satisfaction of a State of Colorado
    Medicaid lien for payment of vaccine-injury medical expenses for L.C.), via a check
    payable jointly to petitioners and the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and
    Financing, Third Party Liability & Recoveries Section, 1570 Grant Street, Denver,
    CO 80203-1818, Attn: Erika L. Herrera, State ID No.: P493554.
    Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with
    the terms of the proffer and this opinion.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Thomas L. Gowen
    Thomas L. Gowen
    Special Master
    3
    Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule
    11(a).
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ___________________________________
    )
    ERIC P. CABRERA and CAROL              )
    CABRERA, natural parents and           )
    Guardians of L.C., a minor,            )
    )
    Petitioners,                   )    No. 13-598V ECF
    )
    v.                      )    Special Master Gowen
    )
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                    )
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                    )
    )
    Respondent.                     )
    ___________________________________ )
    PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1
    I.     Procedural History
    On August 21, 2013, Eric P. Cabrera and Carol Cabrera (“petitioners”) filed a petition for
    compensation on behalf of their minor child, LC, under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
    Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq. (“Vaccine Act”). Petitioners allege that,
    as a result of receiving the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (“DTaP”) vaccine on August 30,
    2010, LC developed juvenile idiopathic arthritis (“JIA”). On September 26, 2014, respondent
    filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, denying that entitlement to compensation was appropriate in
    this case. On January 12, 2017, the Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that
    petitioners were entitled to compensation for LC.
    II.    Items of Compensation
    Petitioners allege entitlement to the following elements of compensation on behalf of LC:
    1
    This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to
    address after the Damages Decision is issued.
    (1) past and future pain and suffering; (2) projected vaccine-related expenses; and, (3) past
    unreimbursed expenses.
    Respondent proffers that, based on the Special Master’s ruling on entitlement and the
    evidence of record, petitioners should be awarded the following damages:
    To petitioners, as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the Estate of LC, for LC’s benefit:
    Past and Future Pain and Suffering:           $175,000.00
    Projected Vaccine-Related Expenses:           $ 48,697.00
    $223,697.00
    To petitioners, Eric P. Cabrera and Carol Cabrera:
    Past Unreimbursable Expenses:                 $   1,934.72
    In addition, petitioners filed evidence from the State of Colorado confirming a Medicaid
    lien for payment of vaccine-injury medical expenses for LC, in the amount of $5,289.41.
    Respondent proffers that, based on the Special Master’s ruling in entitlement and the evidence of
    record, petitioners should be awarded $5,289.41, in the form of a check payable jointly to
    petitioners and the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, State I.D. No.
    P493554. 2 These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioners would be
    entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioners agree.
    III.   Form of the Award
    Respondent recommends that compensation provided to petitioners be made through: (1)
    2
    The parties have no objection to the amount of the proffered award of damages.
    Assuming the Special Master issues a damages decision in conformity with this proffer, the
    parties waive their right to seek review of such damages decision. However, respondent reserves
    his right, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e), to seek review of the Special Master’s January 12,
    2017 ruling on entitlement.
    2
    a lump sum payment of $223,697.00, via a check to petitioners as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of
    the Estate of LC, for LC’s benefit; (2) a lump sum payment of $1,934.72, via a check payable to
    petitioners; and, (3) a lump sum payment of $5,289.41, via a check payable jointly to petitioners
    and the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, Third Party Liability &
    Recoveries Section, 1570 Grant Street, Denver, CO 80203-1818, Attn: Erika L. Herrera, State
    I.D. No: P493554. 3 Petitioners agree.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/Darryl R. Wishard
    DARRYL R. WISHARD
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U. S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box l46, Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Direct dial: (202) 616-4357
    Dated: May 21, 2019                          Fax: (202) 616-4310
    3
    Should LC die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for
    projected vaccine-related expenses and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the right
    to move the Court for appropriate relief.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-598

Judges: Thomas L. Gowen

Filed Date: 6/24/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/24/2019