Johnson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1072V
    Filed: November 5, 2019
    UNPUBLISHED
    MICHELLE JOHNSON,
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                       Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                          Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (SIRVA)
    Respondent.
    Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner.
    Debra A. Filteau Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    Corcoran, Chief Special Master:
    On July 20, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine
    Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (SIRVA) after receiving the influenza vaccine on November 14, 2017.
    Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of
    Special Masters.
    On October 3, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled
    to compensation for SIRVA. On November 1, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on award
    of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $72,500.00. Proffer
    at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered
    1
    I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the
    decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule
    18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of
    which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified
    material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished
    decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United
    States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that petitioner is entitled to an award
    as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $72,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Michelle
    Johnson. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
    available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    *************************************
    MICHELLE JOHNSON,                   *
    *
    Petitioner,       *                         No. 18-1072V
    *                         CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER CORCORAN
    v.                                  *
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND             *
    HUMAN SERVICES,                     *
    *
    Respondent.       *
    *************************************
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On September 27, 2019, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report, conceding that petitioner’s
    claim meets the Table criteria for a SIRVA injury. On October 3, 2019, the Court issued a
    Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation under the Vaccine Act.
    I.       Items of Compensation
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    the following, and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment
    award:
    A lump sum payment of $72,500.00, which represents compensation for pain and
    suffering, see 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4).
    These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be
    entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees.
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the
    Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain
    and suffering.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that petitioner be awarded a lump sum payment of $72,500.00, in the
    form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    GABRIELLE M. FIELDING
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY
    DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Phone: (202) 616-4181
    Dated: November 1, 2019
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1072

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 12/26/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/26/2019