Mendoza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-1475V
    UNPUBLISHED
    MICHAEL MENDOZA, Guardian ad                                Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Litem of C.M., a minor,
    Filed: November 10, 2021
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                          Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    Respondent.
    Alan Kenneth Nicolette, Nordstrom, Steele, et al., Tustin, CA, for Petitioner.
    Matthew Murphy, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On October 26, 2020, Michael Mendoza filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”), on behalf of C.M. Petitioner alleges that C.M. suffered Guillain-Barré
    Syndrome (“GBS”) which meets the Table definition for GBS after receiving the influenza
    vaccine on September 6, 2019. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 40. The case was assigned to the
    Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On April 2, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to
    compensation for C.M.’s GBS. On November 10, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded compensation
    in the amount of $6,231.59 for past unreimburseable expenses and an amount not to
    1
    Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    exceed $150,000.00 to purchase an annuity contract as described in II.B. for pain and
    suffering. Proffer at 2-3. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees
    with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is
    entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award the following:
    A. A lump sum in the amount of $6,231.59, representing compensation for
    actual unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to
    Petitioner; and
    B. A lump sum of $150,000.00 to purchase the annuity contract described
    in Section II.B of the Proffer, representing compensation for pain and
    suffering.
    These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under
    Section 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    __________________________________________
    )
    MICHEAL MENDOZA, Guardian ad              )
    Litem of C.M., a minor,                   )
    )
    Petitioner,          )                 No. 20-1475V
    v.                                       )                 Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )                 ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                  )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                          )
    )
    Respondent.          )
    __________________________________________)
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER OF DAMAGES
    I.        Procedural History
    On October 26, 2020, Michael Mendoza, guardian ad litem of C.M, a minor,
    (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
    of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that C.M. suffered
    Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered to
    him on September 6, 2019. Petition at 1. On March 29, 2021, the Secretary of Health and
    Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate
    for compensation under the terms of the Act, and on April 2, 2021, the Chief Special Master
    issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 25; ECF
    No. 26.
    II.       Items of Compensation and Form of the Award
    1
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers, and the parties recommend, that
    compensation be made through a lump sum and future annuity payments as described below, and
    request that the Chief Special Master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following:1
    A.      Past Unreimbursable Expenses
    Evidence supplied by petitioner documents his expenditure of past unreimbursable
    expenses related to C.M.'s vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
    awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $6,231.59, in the form of a check
    payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.
    B.      Pain and Suffering
    For pain and suffering, an amount not to exceed $150,000.00 to purchase an annuity contract,2
    paid to the life insurance company3 from which the annuity will be purchased,4 subject to the
    conditions described below, that will provide payments to C.M. as set forth below:
    1
    Should C.M. die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
    expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
    2
    At respondent’s discretion, respondent may purchase one or more annuity contracts from
    one or more life insurance companies.
    3
    The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and surplus,
    exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company must have
    one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:
    a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;
    b. Moody's Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa;
    c. Standard and Poor's Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-,
    AA, AA+, or AAA;
    d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability
    Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.
    4
    Petitioner authorizes the disclosure of certain documents filed by the petitioner in this case
    consistent with the Privacy Act and the routine uses described in the National Vaccine Injury
    Compensation Program System of Records, No. 09-15-0056.
    2
    1. Beginning June 11, 2023, $25,000.00 per year for four (4) years certain.
    2. A certain lump sum of $12,751.65 payable on June 11, 2026.
    3. A certain lump sum of $14,187.17 payable on June 11, 2030.
    4. A certain lump sum of $14,945.35 payable on June 11, 2032.
    5. A certain lump sum of $16,182.43 payable on June 11, 2035.
    The purchase price of the annuity described in this section II.B shall neither be greater
    nor less than $150,000.00. In the event that the cost of the certain annuity payments set forth
    above varies from $150,000.00, the lump sum payment due on June 11, 2035, listed above, shall
    be adjusted to ensure that the total cost of the annuity is neither less than nor greater than
    $150,000.00. Should C.M. predecease any of the certain annuity payments set forth above, said
    payments shall be made to his estate. Written notice to the Secretary of Health and Human
    Services and to the Life Insurance Company shall be provided within twenty (20) days of C.M.’s
    death.
    These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which C.M. would be entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.5
    III.      Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    A.      Past Unreimbursable Expenses:                                        $6,231.59
    B.      A lump sum of $150,000.00 to purchase the annuity contract described
    above in section II. B.
    5
    At the time payment is received, C.M. will be an adult, and thus guardianship is not
    required.
    3
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/Emilie F. Williams
    EMILIE F. WILLIAMS
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Direct Dial: (202) 305-0124
    DATED: November 10, 2021
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1475

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 12/13/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/14/2021