Birch v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1925V
    UNPUBLISHED
    KATHLYN BIRCH,                                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: June 15, 2022
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)
    Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
    Petitioner.
    Debra A. Filteau Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On December 17, 2018, Kathlyn Birch filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that was administered
    to her on October 6, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
    Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On November 19, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On June 10, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $47,500.00 in
    pain and suffering. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner
    1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner
    is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $47,500.00 (for pain and suffering) in the form of a check payable
    to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
    available under Section 15(a).
    The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    *************************************
    KATHLYN BIRCH,                      *
    *
    Petitioner,       *                                 No. 18-1925V
    *                                 Chief Special Master Corcoran
    v.                                  *
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND             *
    HUMAN SERVICES,                     *
    *
    Respondent.       *
    *************************************
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On November 10, 2021, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report, conceding that petitioner’s
    claim meets the Table criteria for a SIRVA injury. On November 19, 2021, the Court issued a
    Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation under the Vaccine Act.1
    I.      Items of Compensation
    Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $47,500.00 in pain and suffering.
    See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). The above amount represents all elements of compensation to
    which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.     Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that petitioner be awarded a lump sum payment of $47,500.00, in the
    form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.
    1
    During the pendency of this case, petitioner was married, and on June 9, 2022, the caption was amended to change
    her name from Kathlyn Haynes to Kathlyn Birch.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY
    DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Phone: (202) 616-4181
    Dated: June 10, 2022
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1925

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 7/20/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/20/2022