Donlin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-1240V
    UNPUBLISHED
    LENORA DONLIN,                                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: November 29, 2021
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)
    Kathleen Margaret, Lommen Abdo Law Firm, Minneapolis, MN , for Petitioner.
    Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On September 21, 2020, Lenora Donlin filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that was administered
    to her on September 9, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special
    Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On November 1, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On November 29, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer
    on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $55,413.18
    (comprised of $50,000.00 for pain and suffering, $3,519.31 for lost wages, and $1,893.87
    for unreimbursable medical expenses). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent
    1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a
    whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $55,413.18 (comprised of $50,000.00 for pain and suffering,
    $3,519.31 for lost wages, and $1,893.87 for unreimbursable medical expenses) in
    the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for
    all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    LENORA DONLIN,                                      )
    )
    Petitioner,                   )
    )
    v.                                           ) No. 20-1240V
    ) Chief Special Master Brian Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF                                        )
    HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,                          )
    )
    Respondent.                   )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On October 29, 2021, respondent filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report concluding that
    petitioner suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) within the
    Table timeframe following an influenza vaccination, which was compensable under the National
    Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34. Accordingly,
    on November 1, 2021, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement.
    I.    Items of Compensation
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $50,000.00 for pain and suffering,
    $3,519.31 for lost wages, and $1,893.87 for unreimbursable medical expenses. These amounts
    represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
    15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $55,413.18 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 1 This
    lump sum payment represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    DARRYL R. WISHARD
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/ LARA A. ENGLUND
    LARA A. ENGLUND
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 307-3013
    E-mail: lara.a.englund@usdoj.gov
    Dated: November 29, 2021
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
    expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1240

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 1/6/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/6/2022