Imani v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 21-0777V
    UNPUBLISHED
    SHAFIQ IMANI,                                               Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: August 26, 2022
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Tetanus Diphtheria acellular
    Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Respondent.                            Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (SIRVA)
    Jerome A. Konkel, Samster, Konkel & Safran, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Petitioner.
    Tyler King, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On January 21, 2021, Shafiq Imani filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    injury (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving the diphtheria, tetanus, and
    pertussis (Tdap) vaccine on June 19, 2018. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 3, 20. The case was assigned
    to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On August 2, 2022, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled
    to compensation for his SIRVA. On August 26, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on award
    1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 
    Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100
     Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $62,500.00.3 Proffer
    at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered
    award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as
    stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $62,500.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount
    represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
    The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3Respondent does not indicate the specific categories and amounts of compensation agreed upon by the
    parties, but provides only a total agreed upon amount. Proffer at 2. In the future, Respondent should
    provide this information in his proffer, if possible.
    4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    SHAFIQ IMANI,
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                 No. 21-777V
    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                            ECF
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION1
    I.       Procedural History
    On January 21, 2021, Shafiq Imani (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    (“petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to
    -34, as amended. He alleges that he sustained a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, within the Table time
    period following administration of a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”)
    vaccine he received on June 19, 2018. See Petition. On August 1, 2022, respondent filed his
    Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the
    terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 28. On August 2, 2022, the Chief
    Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to
    compensation for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 29.
    1
    This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address
    after the Damages Decision is issued.
    II.    Items of Compensation
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be
    awarded a lump sum of $62,500.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to
    which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    III.   Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
    a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision
    and the Court’s judgment award the following2: a lump sum payment of $62,500.00, in the
    form of a check payable to petitioner.
    IV.    Summary of Recommended Payment Following Judgment
    Lump sum payable to petitioner, Shafiq Imani: $62,500.00
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    TRACI R. PATTON
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    2
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the
    Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain
    and suffering.
    s/ Tyler C. King
    TYLER C. KING
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 305-0730
    Tyler.King@usdoj.gov
    Dated: August 26, 2022
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-777

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 10/5/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/6/2022