Dressler v. United States ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •           In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    No. 22-1284C
    (Filed: October 28, 2022)
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    ***************************************
    MARY LOUISE DRESSLER,                 *
    *
    Plaintiff,          *
    *
    v.                                    *
    *
    THE UNITED STATES,                    *
    *
    Defendant.          *
    *
    ***************************************
    ORDER
    Ms. Mary Louise Dressler, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action against the
    United States of America. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must
    either pay $402.00 in fees—a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee—or
    request authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees by submitting a signed
    application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See 
    28 U.S.C. §§ 1914
    , 1915.
    Ms. Dressler submitted her complaint without the filing fees or a completed
    IFP application. In an order dated September 14, 2022, this Court ordered
    Ms. Dressler to either pay the $402.00 in required fees or submit an IFP application
    within thirty days. See Order (ECF 6). To date, Ms. Dressler has failed to comply with
    this Court’s previous order.
    This Court may dismiss a case for failure to prosecute when the plaintiff “fails
    … to comply with these rules or a court order.” RCFC 41(b). Here, Plaintiff’s failure
    to comply with an order directing her to pay the filing fee or establish grounds for
    proceeding in forma pauperis justifies dismissal. See, e.g., Bryant v. United States,
    618 F. App’x 683, 686 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (“If a party fails to pay the requisite filing fee,
    despite adequate notice and ample opportunity to do so, the Claims Court acts within
    its discretion when it dismisses the action.”). As a result, this action is dismissed
    without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41 of the Rules of the United
    States Court of Federal Claims.
    The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/ Stephen S. Schwartz
    STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ
    Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-1284

Judges: Stephen S. Schwartz

Filed Date: 10/28/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/28/2022