Pryde v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 14-298V
    Filed: October 24, 2014
    Not for Publication
    *************************************
    JENNIFER PRYDE,                               *
    *
    Petitioner,                    *
    *                  Damages decision based on proffer;
    v.                                            *                  influenza (flu) vaccine; shoulder
    *                  injury related to vaccine
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                           *                  administration (SIRVA); fees and
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                           *                  costs decision based on proffer
    *
    Respondent.                    *
    *
    *************************************
    Paul R. Brazil, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.
    Michael P. Milmoe, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    MILLMAN, Special Master
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1
    On April 14, 2014, petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine
    Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10–34 (2006), alleging that she suffered a right shoulder injury
    as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on August 22, 2013. On September
    11, 2014, respondent orally conceded during a telephonic status conference that petitioner
    suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). See Order, Sept.
    11, 2014.
    1
    Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this case, the
    special master intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims's website, in
    accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,
    2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the
    public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and
    confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted
    invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the
    identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such
    material from public access.
    1
    On October 24, 2014, respondent filed Respondent’s Proffer on Award of Compensation.
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $75,000.00 for all elements of
    compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-15(a)(1),
    15(a)(3)(A), and 15(a)(4). Respondent also proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    $14,390.49 for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs. In accordance with General Order
    #9, petitioner’s counsel asserts that petitioner did not incur any costs in pursuit of her petition.
    The undersigned finds the terms of the proffer to be reasonable. Based on the record as
    a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to the award as stated in the proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached proffer, the court awards:
    a.        a lump sum of $75,000.00, representing all elements of compensation to which
    petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The award shall be
    in the form of a check for $75,000.00 made payable to petitioner; and
    b.        a lump sum of $14,390.49, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and
    costs. The award shall be in the form of a check for $14,390.49 made payable
    jointly to petitioner and Muller Brazil, L.L.P.
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
    the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    Dated: October 24, 2014                                                     /s/ Laura D. Millman
    Laura D. Millman
    Special Master
    2
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
    jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ____________________________________
    )
    JENNIFER PRYDE,                     )
    )
    Petitioner,             )   No. 14-298V
    )   Special Master Millman
    v.                            )   ECF
    )
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND             )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                     )
    )
    Respondent.             )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.     Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items
    The special master’s order dated September 11, 2014, reflected the discussion held by the
    parties at the status conference held on that day. The order states, “In lieu of filing a Rule 4(c)
    Report, respondent orally conceded that petitioner suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (SIRVA) that was caused by her flu vaccination.” Order of September 11, 2014,
    Docket Entry #10. Respondent now proffers that, based on the evidence of record, petitioner
    should be awarded $75,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which
    petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1); 15(a)(3)(A); and 15(a)(4).
    Petitioner agrees.
    Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e), respondent further proffers that petitioner is entitled
    to attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $14,390.49. Petitioner agrees. In accordance with
    General Order No. 9, petitioner’s counsel acknowledges that petitioner incurred no out of pocket
    expenses in proceeding on the petition.
    II.      Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through lump sum payments as described below, and request that the special master’s decision
    and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1
    A. A lump sum payment of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Jennifer
    Pryde. This amount accounts for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C.
    § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be entitled.
    B. A lump sum of $14,390.49 in the form of a check payable to petitioner and petitioner's
    attorney, Paul R. Brazil, Esq., for attorneys' fees and costs
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOYCE R. BRANDA
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
    Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    GLENN A. MACLEOD
    Senior Trial Counsel
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate
    relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and
    future lost wages.
    /s/ Michael P. Milmoe
    MICHAEL P. MILMOE
    Senior Trial Counsel
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Phone: (202) 616-4125
    Dated: October 24, 2014   Fax:    (202) 616-4310
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-298

Judges: Laura D Millman

Filed Date: 11/14/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021