Scallion v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-0992V
    UNPUBLISHED
    MARY KATHERINE SCALLION,                                    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: November 16, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)
    Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC, for Petitioner.
    Sarah Black Rifkin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On July 11, 2019, Mary Katherine Scallion filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to
    vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as a result of receiving a pneumococcal vaccine
    administered on October 11, 2018. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that her injury
    lasted for more than six months. Petition at 3. The case was assigned to the Special
    Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On November 13, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On November 16, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer
    on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded a total of
    $94,086.89, (consisting of $92,500.00 in pain and suffering and $1,586.89 for past
    unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury). Proffer at 1-2. In the
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id.
    Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in
    the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $94,086.89, (consisting of $92,500.00 in pain and suffering and
    $1,586.89 for past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury)
    in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for
    all damages that would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    )
    MARY KATHERINE SCALLION,                            )
    )
    Petitioner,                          )
    )   No. 19-992V
    v.                                                  )   Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )   ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN                       )
    SERVICES,                                           )
    )
    Respondent.                          )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On July 11, 2019, Mary Katherine Scallion (“petitioner”) filed a petition for
    compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1
    to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended. Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a
    shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as a result of receiving a
    pneumococcal vaccine administered on October 11, 2018. Petition at 1. On November 13, 2020,
    the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating
    that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table
    injury, and on November 13, 2020, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement
    finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 20; ECF No. 21.
    I.     Items of Compensation
    A.      Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $92,500.00 in pain and suffering.
    See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
    B.      Past Unreimbursable Expenses
    Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable
    expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
    awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,586.89. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
    15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.
    These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
    lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and
    the Court’s judgment award the following 1: a lump sum payment of $94,086.89, in the form of a
    check payable to petitioner.
    III.   Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    Lump sum payable to petitioner, Mary Katherine Scallion:                     $94,086.89
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief.
    2
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s Sarah B. Rifkin
    SARAH B. RIFKIN
    Trial Attorney
    U.S. Department of Justice
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington D.C. 20044-1046
    Tel: (202) 305-5997
    E-mail: Sarah.Rifkin@usdoj.gov
    DATED: November 16, 2020
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-992

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 12/16/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/16/2020