Delapaz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-0922V
    UNPUBLISHED
    KEVIN DELAPAZ,                                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: November 19, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
    Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    Respondent.
    Renee J. Gentry, Vaccine Injury Clinic, George Washington University Law School,
    Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
    Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On June 27, 2018, Kevin Delapaz filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”)
    as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on January 20, 2014. Petition
    at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special
    Masters.
    On March 27, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled
    to compensation for GBS. On November 18, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award
    of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $683,398.81,
    comprised of $195,000.00 for pain and suffering, $485,941.00 for past and future lost
    1  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    wages, and $2,457.81 for past, unreimbursable medical expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In the
    Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id.
    Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in
    the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $683,398.81, comprised of $195,000.00 for pain and suffering,
    $485,941.00 for past and future lost wages, and $2,457.81 for past, unreimbursable
    medical expenses, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount
    represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    KEVIN DELAPAZ,                                      )
    )
    Petitioner,                   )
    )
    v.                                           ) No. 18-922V
    ) Chief Special Master Brian Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF                                        )
    HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,                          )
    )
    Respondent.                   )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On March 26 2020, respondent filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report concluding that petitioner
    suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome within the Table timeframe following an influenza
    vaccination, which was compensable under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986,
    as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34. Accordingly, on March 27, 2020, the Chief Special
    Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement.
    I.    Items of Compensation
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $195,000.00 for pain and
    suffering, $485,941.00 for past and future lost wages, and $2,457.81 for past, unreimburseable
    medical expenses. These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is
    entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $683,398.81 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 1 This
    lump sum payment represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JEFFREY BOSSERT CLARK
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/ LARA A. ENGLUND
    LARA A. ENGLUND
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 307-3013
    E-mail: lara.a.englund@usdoj.gov
    Dated: November 18, 2020
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
    expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-922

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 12/22/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/23/2020