Perez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-702V
    UNPUBLISHED
    ANTONIO PEREZ,                                            Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: March 4, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
    Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    Respondent.
    Michael Adly Baseluos, Baseluos Law Firm, PLLC, San Antonio, TX, for petitioner.
    Mark K. Hellie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    On May 14, 2019, Antonio Perez filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome
    (“GBS”) caused by an influenza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was
    assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On October 17, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for GBS. On February 27, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $84,265.00
    comprised of $83,500.00 for pain and suffering, and $765.00 in past unreimbursed
    medical expenses. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
    to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    agrees with the proffered award.
    Id. Based on
    the record as a whole, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $84,265.00 (comprised of $83,500.00 for pain and suffering, and
    $765.00 in past unreimbursed medical expenses) in the form of a check payable
    to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
    available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ANTONIO PEREZ,
    Petitioner,
    Case No. 19-702V (ECF)
    v.                                                     CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER
    CORCORAN
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On May 14, 2019, petitioner filed a petition seeking compensation under the
    Vaccine Act for Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) that he claimed occurred within the
    Table timeframe following a flu vaccine. On October 15, 2019, respondent conceded that
    entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act.
    Thereafter, on December 20, 2019, the Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement,
    finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for a GBS Table injury.
    I.     Items of Compensation
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be
    awarded $84,265.00. The award is comprised of the following: $83,500.00 for pain and
    suffering and $765.00 in past unreimbursed medical expenses. This amount represents
    all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
    15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $84,265.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
    Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not
    required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    GABRIELLE M. FIELDING
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/ Mark K. Hellie
    MARK K. HELLIE
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    T: (202) 616-4208
    E: mark.hellie@usdoj.gov
    DATED: February 27, 2020
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-702

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 4/6/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/7/2020