Hildebrand v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1268V
    UNPUBLISHED
    LORI A. HILDEBRAND,                                       Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: March 11, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                           Administration (SIRVA)
    Jeffrey A. Golvash, Golvash & Epstein, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA, for petitioner.
    Laurie Wiesner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    On August 22, 2018, Lori Hildebrand filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to
    Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of her September 23, 2016 influneza (“flu”)
    vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
    Office of Special Masters.
    On October 25, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On March 9, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $66,000.00
    in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for
    projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. Proffer at 1-2. In
    the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award.
    Id. 1 Because
    this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
    to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in
    the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $66,000.00 (representing compensation for Petitioner’s actual
    and projected pain and suffering) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.
    This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under §
    15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ____________________________________
    )
    LORI HILDEBRAND,                      )
    )
    )
    Petitioner,              )
    )    No. 18-1268V
    v.                              )    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )    ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND               )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                       )
    )
    Respondent.              )
    ____________________________________)
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On August 22, 2018, Lori Hildebrand (“petitioner”) filed a petition for
    compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§
    300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury
    Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza vaccine she
    received on September 23, 2016. Petition at 3-5. On October 24, 2019, the Secretary of
    Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this
    case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act, and on October 25,
    2019, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled
    to compensation. ECF No. 32; ECF No. 33.
    I.        Item of Compensation
    Respondent proffers that Lori Hildebrand should be awarded $66,000.00 in actual
    and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and
    suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
    agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this
    case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to Lori Hildebrand
    should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and request that the
    Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following 1: a lump
    sum payment of $66,000.00, representing compensation for pain and suffering, in the
    form of a check payable to petitioner, Lori Hildebrand.
    III.   Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    Lump sum payable to petitioner, Lori Hildebrand:                      $66,000.00
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER PEARLMAN
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the
    Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future
    lost earnings and future pain and suffering.
    s/Laurie Wiesner
    LAURIE WIESNER
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 146
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 305-0253
    DATE: March 9, 2020
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1268

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 4/14/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/14/2020