Gibson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                  In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    Filed: July 30, 2020
    * * * * * * * *                     *    *    *   *    *
    AMY LYNN GIBSON,                                       *                 UNPUBLISHED
    *
    Petitioner,                          *                 No. 18-263V
    *
    v.                                                     *                 Special Master Gowen
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                                    *                 Stipulation; Influenza (Flu);
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                                    *                 Bell’s Palsy.
    *
    Respondent.                          *
    *    * *     *    * * * *           *    *    *   *    *
    Bridget C. McCullough, Muller Brazil LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
    Lara A. Englund, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION ON STIPULATION1
    On February 20, 2018, Amy Lynn Gibson (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    within the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petition (ECF No. 1). The petition
    seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of an influenza (flu)
    vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §
    100.3(a).
    Petitioner received the flu vaccine on or about October 3, 2016. The vaccine was
    administered within the United States. Petitioner alleges that the flu vaccine caused her to suffer
    Bell’s Palsy and that she experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six
    months.
    1
    Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a
    reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the website of the United States Court of
    Federal Claims. The Court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the opinion
    is posted on the Court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information
    furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or
    confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
    unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). An objecting party must provide the Court with a proposed
    redacted version of the opinion.
    Id. If neither party
    files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will
    be posted on the Court’s website without any changes.
    Id. 2
      The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine
    Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012)
    (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. §
    300aa.
    On July 30, 2020, respondent filed a stipulation providing that a decision should be
    entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 44). Respondent denies that
    the flu vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s alleged Bell’s Palsy or any other injury or her current
    condition.
    Id. at ¶ 6.
    Maintaining their respective positions, the parties nevertheless now agree
    that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding
    compensation according to the terms of the stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A.
    Id. at ¶ 7.
    The stipulation awards:
    1) A lump sum of $51,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
    This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
    U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). I adopt the stipulation as the decision of the Court and hereby award
    compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court
    SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Thomas L. Gowen
    Thomas L. Gowen
    Special Master
    3Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine
    Rule 11(a).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-263

Judges: Thomas L. Gowen

Filed Date: 8/20/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/20/2020