Tyson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-975V
    UNPUBLISHED
    PAULA D. TYSON,                                           Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: July 20, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                           Administration (SIRVA)
    Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
    Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On July 9, 2018, Paula D. Tyson filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered right shoulder injuries related to
    vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on
    February 8, 2017. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccine
    in the United States, her injuries and sequelae lasted more than six months, no action
    has been filed for Petitioner’s vaccine-related injury, nor has she received any
    compensation in the form of award or settlement for her vaccine-related injuries.
    Petition at 1, 3. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of
    Special Masters.
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the
    E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
    to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
    § 300aa (2012).
    On January 13, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On July 17, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $81,211.46.
    Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the
    proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to
    an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $81,211.46 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This
    amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    PAULA D. TYSON,               )
    )
    Petitioner,         )
    v.                            )                      No. 18-975V
    )                      Chief Special Master Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )                      ECF
    SERVICES,                     )
    )
    Respondent.         )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On October 25, 2019, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a Findings of Fact, finding
    that the onset of petitioner’s right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”)
    occurred within 48 hours of vaccination. ECF No. 25 at 2, 5. On January 9, 2020, the Secretary
    of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed an Amended Vaccine Rule 4(c) Report
    advising that, in light of Chief Special Master Corcoran’s Findings of Fact ruling that the onset
    of petitioner’s right arm pain occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, and the medical evidence
    submitted in this case, respondent did not dispute that petitioner had satisfied all legal
    prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. ECF No. 30 at 3-4. Thereafter, on
    January 13, 2020, Chief Special Master Corcoran entered a Ruling on Entitlement, finding
    petitioner, Paula D. Tyson, entitled to Vaccine Act compensation for her Table SIRVA injury.
    ECF No. 31.
    I.    Amount of Compensation
    Respondent now proffers that, based on the Chief Special Master’s entitlement decision
    and the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded $81,211.46. 1 This amount represents
    all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
    15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made as
    described below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s damages decision and the Court’s
    judgment award the following: 2
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    Through a lump sum of $81,211.46 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount
    represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
    Petitioner agrees.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    ETHAN P. DAVIS
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    1
    The parties have no objection to the amount of the proffered award of damages. Assuming the
    Chief Special Master issues a damages decision in conformity with this proffer, the parties waive
    their right to seek review of such damages decision. However, respondent reserves his right,
    pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e), to seek review of the Chief Special Master’s January 13,
    2020, entitlement decision.
    2
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
    expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.
    2
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/ Traci R. Patton
    TRACI R. PATTON
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Telephone: (202) 353-1589
    Dated: July 17, 2020
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-975

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 8/25/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/26/2020