Hutton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-0082V
    UNPUBLISHED
    WADE HUTTON,                                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: July 23, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
    Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    Respondent.
    Diana Lynn Stadelnikas, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
    Sarah Christina Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On January 16, 2019, Wade Hutton filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain Barre Syndrome
    (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on November 16, 2016.
    Petition at 1-4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of
    Special Masters.
    On February 28, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for GBS. On July 23, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $96,250.00
    in actual and projected pain and suffering, with projected pain and suffering reduced to
    net present value. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
    to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
    § 300aa (2012).
    agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $96,250.00 (for actual and projected pain and suffering, with
    projected pain and suffering reduced to net present value) in the form of a check
    payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
    would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    )
    WADE HUTTON,                                       )
    )
    Petitioner,                       )
    )    No. 19-82V
    v.                                                 )    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )    ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN                      )
    SERVICES,                                          )
    )
    Respondent.                       )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On January 16, 2019, Wade Hutton (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”
    or “Act”), as amended. Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a
    result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to him on November 16, 2016. Petition at 1.
    On February 27, 2020, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule
    4(c) Report recommending that compensation be awarded, and the Chief Special Master issued a
    Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation the following day. ECF No.
    22; ECF No. 23.
    I.        Items of Compensation
    A.     Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that Wade Hutton should be awarded $96,250.00 in actual and
    projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and
    suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
    agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to Wade Hutton should be made
    through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s
    decision and the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $96,250.00,
    representing compensation for pain and suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioner,
    Wade Hutton.
    III.   Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    Lump sum payable to petitioner, Wade Hutton:                                 $ 96,250.00
    Respectfully submitted,
    ETHAN P. DAVIS
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
    and future pain and suffering.
    2
    s/ Sarah C. Duncan
    SARAH C. DUNCAN
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 514-9729
    Fax: (202) 616-4310
    DATED: July 23, 2020
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-82

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 8/25/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/26/2020