Monnens v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-1220V
    UNPUBLISHED
    JOSHUA MONNENS and ELISABETH                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    MONNENS on behalf of R.M., a minor
    child,                                                    Filed: February 7, 2020
    Petitioner,                          Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    v.                                                        Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    Rotavirus Vaccine; Intussusception
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Glynn Weldon Gilcrease, Jr., Law Office of Glynn W. Gilcrease, Jr., PC, Tempe, AZ, for
    petitioner.
    Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On August 16, 2019, Joshua and Elisabeth Monnens filed a petition for
    compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
    §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”), on behalf of their minor child, R.M. Petitioners
    allege that R.M. suffered from an intussusception as a result of receiving a rotavirus
    vaccination on June 11, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special
    Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On November 21, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioners
    entitled to compensation for R.M.’s intussusception. On February 6, 2020, Respondent
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
    to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioners should be
    awarded $50,000.00 as guardians/conservators of R.M.’s estate and $1,029.27,
    representing compensation for their past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In
    the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioners agree with the proffered award. Id.
    Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioners are entitled to an award as stated
    in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioners the
    total amount of $51,029.27 as follows:
    A. A lump sum payment of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
    Petitioners as guardians/conservators of R.M.’s estate; and
    B. A lump sum payment of $1,029.27 in the form of a check payable
    directly to Petitioners, representing compensation for their actual
    unreimbursable expenses.
    These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under
    § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    __________________________________________
    )
    JOSHUA MONNENS and ELISABETH               )
    MONNENS, on behalf of R.M., a minor child, )
    )
    Petitioners,             )
    )  No. 19-1220V (ECF)
    v.                                         )  Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                        )
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                        )
    )
    Respondent.              )
    __________________________________________)
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On November 20, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report, in which he recommended
    that the Court find petitioners Joshua and Elisabeth Monnens, on behalf of their minor son, R.M.,
    entitled to compensation in this case alleging the Table injury intussusception following a
    rotavirus vaccination. On November 21, 2019, the Court entered its Ruling on Entitlement,
    finding petitioners entitled to compensation. Respondent now proffers that petitioners receive an
    award consisting of the following:
    A. A lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioners, as
    guardians/conservators of R.M.’s estate. This amount represents compensation for all
    elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioners, as
    guardians/conservators of R.M.’s estate, are entitled. 1
    1
    Should R.M. die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for
    appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
    expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.
    1
    B. A lump sum payment of $1,029.27, in the form of a check made payable directly to
    petitioners, representing compensation for petitioners’ unreimbursed past expenses
    pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B).
    Petitioners agree with the proffered award described in paragraphs A and B, above. 2
    Petitioners further agree that the payment described in paragraph A, above, shall not be
    made until petitioners provide the Secretary with documentation establishing their appointment
    as guardians/conservators of the estate of R.M. under the laws of the State of North Carolina. If
    petitioners are not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as the
    guardians/conservators of the estate of R.M. at the time a payment pursuant to the Court’s
    judgment is to be made, any such payment shall be paid to the party or parties appointed by a
    court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of R.M. upon
    submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSPEH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    GABRIELLE M. FIELDING
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    2
    This proffer does not include any award for attorneys’ fees and costs that may be awarded
    pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).
    2
    /s/ Voris E. Johnson, Jr.
    VORIS E. JOHNSON, JR.
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 616-4136
    Email: voris.johnson@usdoj.gov
    Dated: February 6, 2020
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1220

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 3/9/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/9/2020