Barrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1304V
    UNPUBLISHED
    ESMERALDA BARRERA,                                        Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: February 12, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
    Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    Respondent.
    John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.
    Ida Nassar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On August 28, 2018, Esmeralda Barrera filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) as a
    result of an influenza vaccine she received on September 20, 2016. Petition at 1. The
    case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On September 11, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for GBS. On February 12, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $110,799.25.
    Proffer at 2. Respondent further proffered that Petitioner should be awarded funds to
    satisfy a Minnesota Department of Human Services (MDHS) Medicaid lien in the
    amount of $2,873.34.
    Id. In the
    Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
    to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
    § 300aa (2012).
    with the proffered award.
    Id. Based on
    the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is
    entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $110.799.25 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. I further
    award a lump sum payment of $2,873.34, representing compensation for
    satisfaction of the MDHS Medicaid lien, payable jointly to Petitioner and the
    MDHS. These amounts represents compensation for all damages that would be
    available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    )
    ESMERALDA BARRERA,                                 )
    )
    Petitioner,                       )
    )    No. 18-1304V
    v.                                                 )    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )    ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN                      )
    SERVICES,                                          )
    )
    Respondent.                       )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On August 28, 2018, Esmeralda Barrera (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34
    (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome as a result of an
    influenza vaccine she received on September 20, 2016. Petition at 1. On September 10, 2019,
    the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating
    that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act, and the Chief Special
    Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation on September
    11, 2019. ECF No. 24; ECF No. 26.
    I.        Items of Compensation
    A.     Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that Esmeralda Barrera should be awarded $100,000.00 in actual and
    projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and
    suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
    agrees.
    B.      Lost Earnings
    The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner has suffered past loss
    of earnings. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past lost earnings
    as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent proffers that the
    appropriate award for petitioner’s lost earnings is $10,799.25. Petitioner agrees.
    C.      Satisfaction of Medicaid Lien
    Respondent further proffers that Esmeralda Barrera should be awarded funds to satisfy a
    Minnesota Department of Human Services (“MDHS”) Medicaid lien in the amount of $2,873.34,
    which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of
    action MDHS may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments that MDHS
    has made to or on behalf of Esmeralda Barrera from the date of her eligibility for benefits
    through the date of judgment in this case as a result of her vaccine-related injury suffered on or
    about September 10, 2019, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner be made through two
    lump sum payments as described below:
    1)      A lump sum payment of $110,799.25 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner. 1
    2)      A lump sum payment of $2,873.34, representing compensation for satisfaction of
    the MDHS Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and to:
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
    and future pain and suffering.
    2
    Minnesota Department of Human Services
    PO Box 64994
    St. Paul, MN 55164-0994
    Memo: Esmeralda Barrera
    Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to Minnesota Department of Human Services.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ Ida Nassar
    IDA NASSAR
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616-4186
    DATED: February 12, 2020
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1304

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 3/24/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/24/2020