Burk v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 15-1123V
    Filed: September 29, 2016
    UNPUBLISHED
    *********************************
    SETH BURK,                                        *
    *
    Petitioner,              *
    v.                                                *
    *        Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                               *        Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                               *
    *
    Respondent.              *
    *
    ****************************
    Anne C. Toale, Maglio, Christopher and Toale, PA (FL), Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
    Althea W. Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On October 5, 2015, Seth Burk (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et
    seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome
    (“GBS”) as a result of his receipt of the influenza (“flu”) and Menactra (meningococcal)
    vaccines on November 18, 2014. Petition at 1-3. On May 17, 2016, the undersigned
    issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation.
    (ECF No. 22).
    On August 26, 2016, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF
    No. 27). Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $12,498.74. Id.
    at ¶ 5. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner has filed a signed statement
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    indicating he incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. See Exhibit 8, filed as an Attachment
    to Petitioner’s Motion (ECF No. 27).3
    On September 28, 2016, respondent filed a response stating respondent has no
    objection to petitioner’s motion. (ECF No. 29).
    The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
    § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and the lack of opposition
    from respondent, the undersigned GRANTS petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and
    costs.
    Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $12,498.744 as a lump
    sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel
    Anne Toale. Per petitioner’s request, the award for attorney’s fees and costs shall be
    forwarded to Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, 1605 Main Street, Suite 710, Sarasota
    Florida 34236 which is the address of record for petitioner’s counsel. Motion at ¶ 6.
    The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.5
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3 Additionally, in accordance with General Order #9, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner
    incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. Petitioner’s Motion at ¶ 4.
    4This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
    charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
    Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
    be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
    
    924 F.2d 1029
     (Fed. Cir.1991).
    5 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-1123

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 1/9/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021