Sternal v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-1130V
    UNPUBLISHED
    NATALIE STERNAL,                                            Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: January 28, 2021
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)
    John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for petitioner.
    Zoe Wade, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    On August 5, 2019, Natalie Sternal filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered the “Table Injury” of Shoulder Injury
    Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of her October 5, 2017 influneza
    (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of
    the Office of Special Masters.
    On December 30, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On January 27, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $144,077.80.
    The award is comprised of the following: $140,000.00 for pain and suffering and
    $4,077.80 for unreimbursed medical expenses. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a
    whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $144,077.80 (comprised of $140,000.00 for pain and suffering and
    $4,077.80 for unreimbursed medical expenses) in the form of a check payable to
    Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available
    under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ___________________________________
    )
    NATALIE STERNAL,                    )
    )
    Petitioner,             )
    )   No. 19-1130V
    v.                            )   Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )   ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND             )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                     )
    )
    Respondent.             )
    ____________________________________)
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.        Items of Compensation
    On December 28, 2020, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was
    appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act in this case. ECF No. 26. Thereafter, on
    December 30, 2020, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that
    petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (“SIRVA”). ECF No. 27. Based upon the evidence of record, respondent
    proffers that petitioner should be awarded $144,077.80. The award is comprised of the
    following: $140,000.00 for pain and suffering and $4,077.80 for unreimbursed medical
    expenses. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be
    entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.      Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
    a lump sum payment of $144,077.80, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner
    agrees.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Acting Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    DARRYL R. WISHARD
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ Zoë R. Wade
    Zoë R. Wade
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616- 4118
    zoe.wade@usdoj.gov
    Dated: January 27, 2021
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1130

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 3/4/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/4/2021