Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-232V
    UNPUBLISHED
    VICTORIA LEMING and KEVIN                                   Chief Special Master Corcoran
    LEMING, Parents and Natural
    Guardians of A.L., a Minor,,                                Filed: February 23, 2021
    Petitioners,                           Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    v.                                                          Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     (DTaP) Vaccine; Measles-mumps-
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             rubella-varicella (MMRV) Vaccine;
    Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)
    Respondent.                            vaccine; Thrombocytopenic Purpura
    (ITP)
    Robert Joel Krakow, Law Office of Robert J. Krakow, P.C. New York, NY, for
    Petitioners.
    Julia Marter Collison, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    On February 14, 2018, Victoria and Kevin Leming filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2
    (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioners allege that a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (“MMRV”),
    a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (“DTaP”), and/or a Haemophilus influenzae type
    b (“Hib”) vaccine that A.L. received on September 6, 2016, caused her to suffer from
    immune thrombocytopenic purpura (“ITP”), immune dysfunction, and immunodeficiency.
    Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of
    Special Masters.
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    On November 4, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioners
    entitled to compensation for A.L.’s ITP. On February 18, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer
    on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating that A.L. should be awarded $35,000.00
    in actual and projected pain and suffering, and that Petitioners should be awarded past
    unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $5,992.89. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer,
    Respondent represented that Petitioners agree with the proffered award. Id. Based on
    the record as a whole, I find that A.L. and Petitioners are entitled to an award as stated in
    the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award the following
    compensation:
    •   A lump sum payment of $35,000.00, representing pain and suffering, in the
    form of a check payable to Petitioners as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of
    A.L., for the benefit of A.L.
    •   A lump sum payment of $5,992.89 representing compensation for past
    unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to Petitioners.
    This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under §
    15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ____________________________________
    )
    VICTORIA LEMING and KEVIN              )
    LEMING, Parents and Natural            )
    Guardians of A.L., a Minor,            )    No. 18-232V
    )    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioners,             )    SPU
    )
    v.                              )
    )
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                        )
    )
    Respondent.              )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On February 15, 2018, Victoria Leming and Kevin Leming (“petitioners”), as parents and
    natural guardians on behalf of A.L., a minor, filed a petition for compensation under the National
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or
    “Act”). Petitioners allege that a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (“MMRV”), a diphtheria-
    tetanus-acellular pertussis (“DTaP”), and/or a Haemophilus influenzae type b (“Hib”) vaccine
    that A.L. received on September 6, 2016, caused her to suffer from immune thrombocytopenic
    purpura (“ITP”), immune dysfunction, and immunodeficiency. On July 12, 2019, the Special
    Master issued a Ruling on Facts, finding that “petitioners have established A.L.’s alleged injury
    meets the severity requirement described in §300aa-11(c)(1)(D) of the Vaccine Act.” On
    November 2, 2020, respondent filed his Amended Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, preserving his right
    to appeal the Special Master’s July 12, 2019, Ruling on Facts, and submitting that petitioner has
    otherwise satisfied the legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. See 42
    U.S.C. §§ 300aa-11(c)(1)(D), 300aa-13(a)(1). On November 4, 2020, the Chief Special Master
    -1-
    issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation.
    I.     Items of Compensation
    A.      Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that A.L. should be awarded $35,000.00 in actual and projected pain
    and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been
    reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioners agree.
    B.      Past Unreimbursable Expenses
    Evidence supplied by petitioners documents their expenditure of past unreimbursable
    expenses related to A.L.’s vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioners should be
    awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $5,992.89. Petitioners agree.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to A.L. and petitioners should be
    made through lump sum payments as described below, and request that the special master’s
    decision and the Court’s judgment award the following1:
    A. A lump sum payment of $35,000.00, representing pain and suffering, in the form of a
    check payable to petitioners as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of A.L., for the benefit of A.L. No
    payments shall be made until petitioners provide respondent with documentation establishing
    that they have been appointed as the guardian(s)/conservator(s) of A.L.’s estate. If petitioners
    are not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of
    the estate of A.L., any such payment shall be made to the party or parties appointed by a court of
    1
    Should A.L. die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the
    Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future
    medical expenses and future pain and suffering.
    -2-
    competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of A.L. upon
    submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary.
    B. A lump sum payment of $5,992.89 representing compensation for past
    unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioners, Victoria Leming and
    Kevin Leming.
    III.     Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    A.    Lump sum paid to petitioners as court-appointed
    guardian(s)/conservator(s) of A.L.’s estate:                        $   35,000.00
    B.    Paid to petitioners, Victoria Leming and Kevin Leming:              $       5,992.89
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Acting Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ Julia M. Collison
    JULIA M. COLLISON
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Ben Franklin Station
    Washington, DC 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 305-0102
    Dated:         February 18, 2021             Julia.collison@usdoj.gov
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-232

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 3/29/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/29/2021