Roth v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-0944V
    UNPUBLISHED
    LEANNE ROTH,                                            Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                         Filed: October 28, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                 Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                         Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                          Administration (SIRVA)
    Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
    Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
    respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    On June 28, 2019, Leanne Roth filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on
    October 20, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of
    the Office of Special Masters.
    On October 23, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
    that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at
    1. Specifically, Respondent “believes that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a
    1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
    to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
    of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
    with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
    the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
    the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
    2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    SIRVA, as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table”. Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that
    Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months. Id.
    In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-944

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 12/2/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/2/2020