Novarro v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                 In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 11-707V
    (Not to be Published)
    *********************
    BOYNE WOLF BARONE, as            *
    Conservator of Person and Estate *
    of, JOAN NOVARRO,                *
    *                                 Special Master Corcoran
    *
    Petitioner,        *                                 Filed: October 31, 2016
    *
    v.                               *                                 Decision; Attorney’s Fees and
    *                                 Costs; Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH              *                                 Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”).
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,              *
    *
    Respondent.        *
    *
    *********************
    Rene Gentry, George Washington University Law School Vaccine Injury Clinic, Washington,
    DC, for Petitioner,
    Lisa Watts, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS DECISION1
    On October 25, 2011, Joan Novarro filed a petition seeking compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Program”) alleging that she developed
    Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) after her receipt of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 31,
    2008.2 Petition at 1(ECF No. 1). Thereafter, on January 30, 2014, Respondent filed a supplemental
    1
    Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my actions in this case, I will post it on the United States
    Court of Federal Claims website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). As
    provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the published decision’s inclusion of
    certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within
    which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or
    financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure
    of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole
    decision will be available to the public. 
    Id. 2 The
    Vaccine Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660,
    100 Stat. 3758, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 through 34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”).
    Individual section references hereafter will be to § 300aa of the Act (but will omit that statutory prefix).
    Rule 4(c) Report requesting that I rule on the existing record. I did so, and ruled in Petitioner’s
    favor. ECF No. 58. After litigating one component of the damages award, the parties filed a proffer
    on July 14, 2016. ECF No. 97. I subsequently issued a decision on July 19, 2016, concluding that
    the proffer was reasonable, and adopting it as my decision awarding Petitioner damages. ECF No.
    98.
    Petitioner filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated October 19, 2016. See ECF
    No. 104. Due to a small error in calculating the student attorney hours, Petitioner filed an amended
    motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated October 21, 2016. ECF No. 105. Petitioner requests
    reimbursement of attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $106,109.49. 
    Id. Of that
    total amount,
    Petitioner requests reimbursement of $3,692.35 for personal costs expended. Petitioner requests
    the remaining $102,417.14 be reimbursed for attorneys’ fees and costs. Respondent filed a
    response indicating she had no objection to the amount sought, concluding the amount was
    reasonable. ECF No. 106.
    I approve the requested amounts for attorney’s fees and costs as reasonable. Accordingly,
    I award a total of $102,417.14 as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner
    and Petitioner’s counsel, Renee Gentry, Esq. I award separate costs payable to Bonye Wolf Barone
    as Conservator of the Person and Estate of Joan Novarro in the amount of $3,692.35. In the absence
    of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the Court SHALL
    ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of Petitioner’s motion.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    /s/ Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately)
    a notice renouncing their right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-707

Filed Date: 12/28/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021