Cantrell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No 16-1581V
    Filed: August 18, 2017
    UNPUBLISHED
    DELLA CANTRELL,
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Petitioner,                          Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    v.                                                       Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu)
    Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.
    Glenn A. MacLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On November 29, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered “severe left shoulder pain” resulting
    from an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on October 3, 2015. Pet. at 1. The case was
    assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On August 16, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
    that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Resp.’s R. 4(c) Rept. at 1.
    Specifically, respondent “concluded that petitioner’s alleged left shoulder injury is
    consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration, or SIRVA, and that
    this injury was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine petitioner received on October 3, 2015.”
    1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    
    Id. at 3.
    Respondent further agrees that no other causes were identified for petitioner’s
    left should injury, that petitioner’s SIRVA ailment persisted for more than six months,
    and therefore that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under
    the Vaccine Act. 
    Id. In view
    of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the
    undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1581

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 1/29/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021