Sorensen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 17-34V
    Filed: October 30, 2017
    UNPUBLISHED
    ALICE SORENSEN,
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Petitioner,                          Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    v.                                                       Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Administration (SIRVA)
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Bruce William Slane, Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., White Plains, NY, for
    petitioner.
    Amy Paula Kokot, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On January 9, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on
    October 21, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit
    of the Office of Special Masters.
    On August 22, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled
    to compensation for a SIRVA. On October 30, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $102,500.00.
    Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner
    is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
    petitioner a lump sum payment of $102,500.00 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner, Alice Sorensen. This amount represents compensation for all damages
    that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    )
    ALICE SORENSEN,                                 )
    )
    Petitioner,                    )
    )       No. 17-34V (ECF)
    v.                                              )       Chief Special Master Dorsey
    )
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                         )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                 )
    )
    Respondent.                    )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.        Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items
    On August 22, 2017, Chief Special Master Dorsey issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding
    that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (“SIRVA”). Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner
    should be awarded $102,500.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which
    petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.       Form of the Award
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner be made through a
    lump sum payment of $102,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 Petitioner
    agrees.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, respondent reserves the right to
    move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for
    future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.
    1
    Respectfully submitted,
    CHAD A. READLER
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/Amy P. Kokot
    AMY P. KOKOT
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Ben Franklin Station
    Washington, DC 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616-4118
    Dated:   October 30, 2017
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-34

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 6/6/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021