Napolitano v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 17-1208V
    Filed: October 16, 2018
    UNPUBLISHED
    MICHAEL NAPOLITANO,
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Petitioner,                          Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    v.                                                       Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
    Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Brenton Aaron Elswick, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
    Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On September 7, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) as
    a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on September 22, 2016. Petition at 1.
    The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On August 6, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled
    to compensation for his GBS injury. On October 12, 2018, respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $152,417.48,
    including $150,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering and $2,417.48 in past
    unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, respondent represented that
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the
    undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
    petitioner a lump sum payment of $152,417.48 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner, Michael Napolitano. This amount represents compensation for all
    damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    MICHAEL NAPOLITANO,
    Petitioner,                             No. 17-1208V
    v.                                                     Chief Special Master Dorsey
    ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    PROFFER ON AWARD OF DAMAGES
    On September 7, 2017, Michael Napolitano (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    (“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34
    (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended. Respondent conceded petitioner’s entitlement to compensation
    in his Rule 4(c) Report filed on August 3, 2018. Based on Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report the Chief
    Special Master found petitioner entitled to compensation.
    I.    Items of Compensation
    A.      Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $150,000.00 in actual and projected pain
    and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to
    net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
    B.      Past Unreimbursable Expenses
    Evidence supplied by petitioner documents his expenditure of past unreimbursable expenses
    related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past
    unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $2,417.48. Petitioner agrees.
    1
    II.    Form of the Award
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
    lump sum payment of $152,417.48, in the form of a check made payable to petitioner. 1 This lump sum
    payment represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C.
    § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/Jennifer L. Reynaud
    JENNIFER L. REYNAUD
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 305-1586
    Date: October 12, 2018
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for
    appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future
    lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-1208

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 12/12/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021