Fennig v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 17-2019V
    Filed: October 18, 2018
    UNPUBLISHED
    RANDALL FENNIG,
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Petitioner,                          Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    v.                                                       Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Clifford John Shoemaker, Shoemaker, Gentry & Knickelbein, Vienna, VA, for petitioner.
    Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On December 22, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillian-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) as
    a result of the influenza vaccination received on October 17, 2016. Petition at 1-2. The
    case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On October 17, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
    that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report
    at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner suffered the Table injury of GBS
    following a flu vaccine within the Table time period, and there is not a preponderance of
    the medical evidence that petitioner’s GBS was due to a factor unrelated to the
    1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    vaccination.” Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that “[t]he claim also meets the
    statutory severity requirements because petitioner experienced sequelae of his GBS for
    more than six months” and therefore “compensation is appropriate, as petitioner has
    satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id.
    In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the
    undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-2019

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 12/12/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021