Allevato v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 16-1437V
    Filed: June 30, 2017
    UNPUBLISHED
    CLARA ALLEVATO,
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Petitioner,                          Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    v.                                                       Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Administration (SIRVA)
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.
    Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On October 31, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she received a Prevnar pneumococcal conjugate
    vaccine on November 23, 2015, and thereafter suffered a right shoulder injury that was
    caused-in-fact by the vaccine. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special
    Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On June 2, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to
    compensation for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). On
    June 30, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”)
    indicating petitioner should be awarded $57,500.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer,
    respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated
    in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
    petitioner a lump sum payment of $57,500.00 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner, Clara Allevato. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
    would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ____________________________________
    )
    CLARA ALLEVATO,                      )
    )
    Petitioner,              )
    )  No. 16-1437V
    v.                             )  Chief Special Master Dorsey
    )  ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND              )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                      )
    )
    Respondent.              )
    ____________________________________)
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.     Items of Compensation
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    $57,500.00 which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $57,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
    Petitioner agrees.
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
    expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
    Respectfully submitted,
    CHAD A. READLER
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/Christine Mary Becer
    CHRISTINE MARY BECER
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616-3665
    Date:   June 30, 2017
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1437

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 4/5/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021