Saucedo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 16-0810V
    Filed: November 7, 2017
    UNPUBLISHED
    LINDA SAUCEDO,
    Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
    Petitioner,                          Stipulation on Damages; Influenza
    v.                                                       (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
    Related to Vaccine Administration
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  (SIRVA)
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Diana Lynn Stadelnikas, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
    Sarah Christina Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On July 8, 2016, Linda Saucedo (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et
    seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related
    to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), including adhesive capsulitis, as a result of an
    influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 31, 2013. Petition at ¶¶ 1, 9;
    Stipulation, filed November 7, 2017, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that her injuries
    have lasted more than six months. Petition at ¶11; Stipulation at ¶ 4. “Respondent
    denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer SIRVA or any other injury.”
    Stipulation at ¶ 6.
    Nevertheless, on November 7, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint
    stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court
    in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned
    awards the following compensation:
    A lump sum of $60,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
    Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
    damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 
    Id. The undersigned
    approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
    the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-810

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 12/12/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021