Bushemi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-1083V
    UNPUBLISHED
    DIANE BUSHEMI,                                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: March 14, 2022
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)
    Edward M. Kraus, Law Offices of Chicago Kent, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner.
    Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On August 27, 2020, Diane Bushemi filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (SIRVA) resulting from an influenza (flu) vaccination received on
    October 8, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of
    the Office of Special Masters.
    On December 9, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On March 14, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $96,028.09,
    including $95,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering and $1,028.09 for past
    unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that
    1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $96,028.09, including $95,000.00 for actual and projected pain and
    suffering and $1,028.09 for past unreimbursable expenses in the form of a check
    payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would
    be available under Section 15(a).
    The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    DIANE BUSHEMI,                )
    )
    Petitioner,         )
    )                     No. 20-1083V
    v.
    )                     Chief Special Master Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )                     SPU
    SERVICES,                     )                     ECF
    )
    Respondent.         )
    )
    PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On August 27, 2020, Diane Bushemi (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34
    (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a left shoulder injury related
    to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following her receipt of an influenza vaccine on October 8,
    2019. Petition (ECF No. 1) at 1, 5. On November 19, 2021, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report
    recommending compensation be awarded. ECF No. 22. On December 9, 2021, the Chief
    Special Master issued Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    ECF No. 24.
    I.   Items of Compensation
    A. Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that the Court should award petitioner a lump sum of $95,000.00 for
    her actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected
    pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4).
    Petitioner agrees.
    B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
    Respondent proffers that the Court should award petitioner a lump sum of $1,028.09 for
    past unreimbursable expenses, as provided under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). Petitioner
    agrees.
    II. Form of the Award.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
    lump sum payment of $96,028.09, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, which represents
    all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
    15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the
    Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future
    medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
    2
    /s/ Claudia B. Gangi
    CLAUDIA B. GANGI
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    (202) 616-4138
    claudia.gangi@usdoj.gov
    DATED: March 14, 2022
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1083

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 4/15/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/15/2022