Gillman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-1422V
    UNPUBLISHED
    JULIA GILLMAN,                                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: March 15, 2022
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)
    Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.
    Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On October 20, 2020, Julia Gillman filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that was administered
    to her on October 8, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
    Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On February 14, 2022, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On March 14, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $100,703.20
    (representing $100,000.00 for pain and suffering, $223.20 for past unreimbursable
    expenses, and $480.00 for lost wages). Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent
    1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a
    whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $100,703.20 (representing $100,000.00 for pain and suffering,
    $223.20 for past unreimbursable expense and $480.00 for lost wages) in the form
    of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages
    that would be available under Section 15(a).
    The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ____________________________________
    )
    JULIA GILLMAN,                       )
    )
    Petitioner,              )
    )  No. 20-1422V
    v.                             )  Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )  ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND              )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                      )
    )
    Respondent.              )
    ____________________________________)
    PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1
    I.     Procedural History
    On October 20, 2020, Julia Gillman (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or
    “Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a left shoulder injury as a result of receiving the
    influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 8, 2018. Petition at 1. On February 11, 2022, respondent
    filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, concluding that petitioner suffered from SIRVA as defined by
    the Vaccine Injury Table, within the Table timeframe. See ECF No. 32. On February 14, 2022,
    Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled
    to compensation for a SIRVA Table injury. See ECF No. 33.
    1
    This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after
    the Damages Decision is issued.
    II.    Items of Compensation
    A.        Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $100,000.00 in pain and suffering.
    See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
    B.        Past Unreimbursable Expenses
    Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable
    expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
    awarded past unreimbursable expenses of $223.20. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B).
    Petitioner agrees.
    C.        Lost Wages
    Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past lost wages related to
    her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past lost
    wages in the amount of $480.00. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.
    The above amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be
    entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    III.   Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
    lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and
    the Court’s judgment award the following 2: a lump sum payment of $100,703.20, in the form of
    a check payable to petitioner.
    2
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the
    2
    IV.     Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    Lump sum payable to petitioner, Julia Gillman:                     $100,703.20
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    DARRYL R. WISHARD
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/Christine Mary Becer
    CHRISTINE MARY BECER
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616-3665
    Christine.m.becer@usdoj.gov
    Date:    March 14, 2022
    Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain
    and suffering.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1422

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 4/18/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2022