Crider v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 21-0597V
    CYNTHIA CRIDER,                                             Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                          Filed: November 6, 2023
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for Petitioner.
    Andrew Henning, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION ON DAMAGES1
    On January 12, 2021, Cynthia Crider filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a right-sided shoulder injury related to
    vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) due to a vaccine she received on September 25, 2019.
    Petition (ECF No. 1). The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office
    of Special Masters (the “SPU”).
    On September 18, 2023, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On November 3, 2023, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”). Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with
    1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
    publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at
    https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of
    2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In
    accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other
    information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I
    agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
    2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 
    Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100
     Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    the proffered award. Id. at 2. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is
    entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award a lump sum
    payment of $20,291.15 (representing $20,000.00 for pain and suffering, and $291.15
    for past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.
    This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under
    Section 15(a).
    The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    CYNTHIA CRIDER,
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                   No. 21-597V (ECF)
    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                              SPU
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On January 12, 2021, Cynthia Crider (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34
    (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of
    an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on or about September 25, 2019. Petition at 1. On
    September 16, 2022, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule
    4(c) Report recommending that entitlement to compensation be denied. ECF No. 25. On
    December 22, 2022, petitioner filed a Motion for a Ruling on the Record. ECF No. 30. On
    February 28, 2023, respondent filed a response, asserting that petitioner had not demonstrated by
    preponderant evidence that: (1) petitioner met the Act’s severity requirement; and (2) petitioner’s
    onset of an alleged Table SIRVA injury occurred within forty-eight hours of vaccination. ECF
    No. 33. Petitioner’s reply followed on March 9, 2023. ECF No. 34. On September 18, 2023,
    Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was
    entitled to vaccine compensation for a Table SIRVA. 1 ECF No. 36.
    I.     Items of Compensation
    A.      Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $20,000.00 in pain and suffering.
    See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
    B.      Past Unreimbursable Expenses
    Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable
    expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
    awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $291.15. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
    15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.
    These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 2 Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
    lump sum payment and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s
    1
    Respondent has no objection to the amount of the proffered award of damages set forth
    herein. Assuming the Chief Special Master issues a damages decision in conformity with this
    proffer, respondent waives his right to seek review of such damages decision. However,
    respondent reserves his right, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e), to seek review of the Chief
    Special Master’s September 18, 2023, entitlement decision.
    2
    Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move
    the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future
    medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
    2
    judgment award the following: a lump sum payment of $20,291.15, in the form of a check
    payable to petitioner.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    TRACI R. PATTON
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ ANDREW J. HENNING
    ANDREW J. HENNING
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 616-4405
    Email: andrew.j.henning@usdoj.gov
    DATED: November 3, 2023
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-0597V

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 12/12/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024