Tincher v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •   In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 22-0525V
    DONNA TINCHER,                                             Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                         Filed: October 10, 2023
    v.
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
    Petitioner.
    Lauren Kells, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
    On May 11, 2022, Donna Tincher filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury as a result of an
    influenza vaccination she received on October 12, 2020. Petition at ¶1-2. Petitioner
    further alleges that her injury lasted longer than six months. Petition at ¶9. The case was
    assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On October 5, 2023, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
    that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at
    1. Specifically, Respondent states that “Petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with
    1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
    publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or
    at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government
    Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
    with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
    the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
    the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
    2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 
    Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100
     Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2018).
    SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, Petitioner had no history of
    pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder prior to vaccination; pain occurred
    within 48 hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain was limited to the
    shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality
    has been identified to adequately explain Petitioner’s shoulder pain.” Id. at 11-12.
    Respondent further agrees that “Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition
    for more than six months.” Id. at 12.
    In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-0525V

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 11/17/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024