Scarfpin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                                CORRECTED
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 22-0431V
    AMY SCARFPIN,                                               Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                         Filed: November 17, 2023
    v.
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
    Dorian Hurley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On April 13, 2022, Amy Scarfpin filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). On November 6, 2023, she filed an amended petition. ECF No. 28.
    Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
    (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving a tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis
    (“Tdap”) vaccine on October 2, 2020. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 16.. The case was assigned to
    the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On November 7, 2023, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
    entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On November 17, 2023, Respondent filed a
    proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded
    $85,420.00, representing compensation in the amounts of $85,000.00 for pain and
    1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
    publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or
    at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government
    Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In
    accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other
    information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I
    agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
    2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 
    Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100
     Stat. 3755.   Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2018).
    suffering and $420.00 for past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer,
    Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on
    the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $85,420.00, representing compensation in the amounts of
    $85,000.00 for pain and suffering and $420.00 for actual unreimbursable expenses
    in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for
    all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
    The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    )
    AMY SCARFPIN,                                      )
    )
    Petitioner,                       )
    )    No. 22-431V (SPU)
    v.                                                 )    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )    ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN                      )
    SERVICES,                                          )
    )
    Respondent.                       )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On April 13, 2022, Amy Scarfpin (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”
    or “Act”). On November 6, 2023, petitioner filed an amended petition (“Amended Petition”)
    alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as
    defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of a tetanus, diphtheria, and
    acellular-pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine she received on October 2, 2020. ECF No. 28 (Amended
    Petition at 1). On November 7, 2023, the Secretary of Health and Human Services
    (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation
    under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury, and later that day, the Chief Special Master
    issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 29; ECF
    No. 30.
    I.     Items of Compensation
    A.      Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $85,000.00 in pain and suffering.
    See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
    B.      Past Unreimbursable Expenses
    Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable
    expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
    awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $420.00. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
    15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.
    These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
    lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and
    the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $85,420.00, in the form of a
    check payable to petitioner.
    III.   Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    Lump sum payable to petitioner, Amy Scarfpin                  $85,420.00
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
    and future pain and suffering.
    2
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    DARRYL R. WISHARD
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ Dorian Hurley
    DORIAN HURLEY
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 353-7751
    Email: Dorian.Hurley@usdoj.gov
    DATED: November 17, 2023
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-0431V

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 12/19/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024