Granville v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 21-2098V
    DANA GRANVILLE,
    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                        Filed: October 25, 2023
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.
    Sarah Black RIfkin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1
    On October 28, 2021, Dana Granville filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”)
    as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on December 3, 2019. Petition at
    1. On August 30, 2023, I issued a decision awarding damages to Petitioner, following
    briefing by the parties and participation in a Motions Day Hearing. ECF No. 31.
    1
    Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
    publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at
    https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of
    2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In
    accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other
    inf ormation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If , upon review, I
    agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material f rom public access.
    2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 
    Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100
     Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section ref erences to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2018).
    Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award
    of $39,561.24 (representing $38,633.60 in attorney’s fees and $927.64 in attorney’s
    costs). Petitioner’s Application for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed Sept. 8,
    2023, ECF No. 35. In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner filed a signed
    statement indicating that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. ECF No. 35-4.
    Respondent reacted to the motion on September 26, 2023, indicating that he is
    satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met
    in this case, but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion.
    Respondent’s Response to Motion at 2-3, 3 n.2, ECF No. 36. On September 26, 2023,
    Petitioner indicated that she does not intend to file a substantive reply to Respondent’s
    response. ECF No. 37.
    I note this case required additional briefing regarding the issue of damages and
    participation in an expedited Motions Day. See Status Report, filed Aug. 15, 2022, ECF
    No. 22 (reporting an impasse in damages discussions); Petitioner’s Damages Brief, filed
    Oct. 19, 2022, ECF No. 26; Petitioner’s Damages Reply Brief, filed Dec. 9, 2022, ECF
    No. 28; Hearing Minute Entry, dated Aug. 28, 2023 (regarding the August 25, 2023
    hearing). Petitioner’s counsel expended approximately 16.4 hours drafting the brief in
    support of damages; and 6.2 hours drafting the reply brief, totaling 22.6 hours. ECF No.
    35-2 at 4-5. I find this amount of time to be reasonable and I will award the attorney’s fees
    requested. (And all time billed to the matter was also reasonably incurred).
    Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all claimed
    cost. ECF No. 35-3. And Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or amounts
    sought. I have reviewed the requested costs and find them to be reasonable.
    The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for
    successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for
    attorney’s fees and costs. I award a total of $39,561.24 (representing $38,633.60 in
    attorney’s fees and $927.64 in attorney’s costs) as a lump sum in the form of a
    check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, John R. Howie, Jr. In
    the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court),
    the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this Decision. 3
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by f iling a joint notice
    renouncing their right to seek review.
    2
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-2098

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 12/5/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024