Baldwin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 21-1215V
    ASHLEY BALDWIN,
    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                        Filed: October 10, 2023
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.
    Lauren Kells, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1
    On April 15, 2021, Ashley Baldwin filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration following receipt of an influenza vaccine on November 24, 2020. Petition,
    ECF No. 1. On August 14, 2023, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner
    based on the Respondent’s proffer. ECF No. 45.
    1
    Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
    publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at
    https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of
    2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In
    accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other
    inf ormation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If , upon review, I
    agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material f rom public access.
    2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 
    Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100
     Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section ref erences to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2018).
    Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award
    of $26,083.98 (representing $25,033.30 in attorney’s fees and $1,050.68 in attorney’s
    costs). Petitioner’s Application for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed Aug. 15,
    2023, ECF No. 49. In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner filed a signed
    statement indicating that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. ECF No. 49-4.
    Respondent reacted to the motion on Aug. 29, 2023, indicating that he is satisfied
    that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this
    case, but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Respondent’s
    Response to Motion at 2-3, ECF No. 50. On Aug. 29, 2023, Petitioner indicated that she
    does not intend to file a substantive reply to Respondent’s response. ECF No. 51.
    I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my
    experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested
    hours or rates. Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all
    claimed costs. ECF No. 49-3. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or
    amounts sought.
    The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for
    successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for
    attorney’s fees and costs. I award a total of $26,083.98 (representing $25,033.30 in
    attorney’s fees and $1,050.68 in attorney’s costs) as a lump sum in the form of a
    check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, John R. Howie, Jr. In
    the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court),
    the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this Decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by f iling a joint notice
    renouncing their right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-1215V

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 11/13/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024