Glunt v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •               In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    Filed: October 28, 2024
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    KRISTI GLUNT,                       *                UNPUBLISHED
    *
    Petitioner,             *                No. 19-1692V
    *
    v.                                  *                Special Master Dorsey
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                 *                Decision Based on Stipulation; Influenza
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                 *                (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to
    *                Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”).
    Respondent.             *
    *
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil PA, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
    Benjamin Patrick Warder, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION BASED ON STIPULATION 1
    On October 31, 2019, Kristi Glunt (“Petitioner”) 2 filed a petition in the National Vaccine
    Injury Program 3 alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
    (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 2, 2018. Petition
    at Preamble (ECF No. 1).
    1
    Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at
    https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with
    access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would
    constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the
    identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from
    public access.
    2
    Petitioner changed her name during pendency of this matter.
    3
    The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
    Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 
    Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100
     Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
    42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this Decision
    to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
    1
    On October 28, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation recommending an award of
    compensation to Petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 99). Respondent denies that Petitioner
    sustained a SIRVA Table injury, denies that Petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury was caused-in-
    fact by the flu vaccine, and denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner any other injury or her
    current condition. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as
    Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of
    the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
    The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
    (1) A lump sum of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner; and
    (2) A lump sum of $4,544.26, representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for
    services rendered to Petitioner by the State of Indiana, in the form of a check
    payable jointly to Petitioner and MultiPlan:
    MultiPlan (Tax ID XX-XXXXXXX)
    535 E. Diehl Road, Suite 100
    Naperville, IL 60563
    Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to MultiPlan.
    This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
    U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stipulation at ¶ 8.
    The undersigned approves the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation.
    Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of
    Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 4
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora B. Dorsey
    Nora B. Dorsey
    Special Master
    4
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
    notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1692V

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 11/22/2024

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/22/2024