Machir's v. Machir's devisees ( 1818 )

By the Court.

The Decree is erroneous in not requiring a refunding bond according to law, ⁽²⁾ and in not decreeing a conveyance, from the heirs of Alexander .Machir, of the land sold to Conrad Wakeman.

it is therefore reversed with costs, and remanded to he reformed, and the cause to be finally proceeded in, pursuant to the principles of this Decree.

(2) Note. See Clay v. Williams, 2 Munf. 105; Stoval’s ex’or. v. Woodson & Wife, 2 Munf. 303; and M‘Rae’s ex'or. v. Brooks & Wife, ante.